PROOF 1.1
DNC MOU Violation

PROOF: The Affirmative Action Committee's Formation Was a Foundational Breach of the 2020 DNC MOU, Rendering It Illegitimate at Inception

Violation: The WVDP's implementation and the RBC's supervisory failure were not mere procedural errors; they constituted a foundational breach of contract and trust. They violated the MOU's core 'caucus-first mandate' by knowingly creating an unaccountable committee through a secretive, pre-arranged process. This initial, deliberate act of disenfranchisement rendered the Affirmative Action Committee illegitimate at the moment of its creation and doomed the entire diversity initiative to fail. The remedy required: void all actions taken by this illegitimate committee and reconstitute it properly with all required caucuses participating.
Stakes: The promise of representation for West Virginia's minority communities was broken at the moment of its supposed creation, disenfranchising the very groups the MOU was meant to empower and guaranteeing the failure of the entire diversity initiative.
Evidence Strength:
4 facts, 3 axioms

The Axioms (The Rules)

1

The Caucus-First Mandate: The MOU required that the Affirmative Action Committee be formed with members 'selected by their particular caucus.' Primary Source

2020-MOU-WVDP-DNC-RBC.pdf, p. 3

2

The State Party's Duty to Implement: The MOU mandated that the State Party 'fully implement... the creation of any new... caucuses.' Primary Source

2020-MOU-WVDP-DNC-RBC.pdf, p. 3

3

The RBC's Duty to Supervise: The MOU explicitly required that the entire implementation process be conducted 'under the supervision... of representatives of the RBC.' Primary Source

2020-MOU-WVDP-DNC-RBC.pdf, p. 2

Rule Summary

These rules established a mandatory, non-negotiable sequence—a blueprint for legitimacy. The MOU required that caucuses be formed first to select their own representatives, who would then constitute the committee. Any other process was a direct breach of the agreement's core terms, and the RBC was the designated supervisor responsible for enforcing that blueprint.

The Offenses (What Happened)

The committee's formation was orchestrated in secret using a non-public script, circulated with the explicit instruction 'do not share,' proving the process was designed to be non-transparent.

Evidence: selina-script-email.pdf, p. 1 Documentary

The script's authors proceeded with full knowledge that their plan excluded the majority of required diversity groups, as the document itself admits the committee was 'missing representation from... Latino's, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, and Native Americans.'

Evidence: selina-script.pdf, p. 2 Official Record

To ensure control, the script pre-emptively installed a hand-picked leadership slate, nullifying the right of the yet-to-be-formed caucuses to participate in selecting their own leadership.

Evidence: selina-script.pdf, p. 1 Official Record

The script's author, Selina Vickers, cemented procedural control by orchestrating her own self-appointment to the role of Parliamentarian, complete with a pre-written endorsement calling her uniquely qualified.

Evidence: selina-script.pdf, p. 3 Official Record

The Logical Reasoning

  1. The MOU promised a legitimate, caucus-driven process for forming the AAC under the watchful eye of the DNC's RBC.
  2. Instead, the State Party, guided by a secret script, deliberately subverted this promise.
  3. This subversion was intentional, as the script's own text proves the organizers knew they were excluding 75% of the required racial diversity caucuses.
  4. By pre-emptively installing leadership, they disenfranchised these minority groups at the committee's inception.
  5. This foundational breach occurred under the mandated supervision of the DNC's RBC, which failed its duty to intervene and enforce the MOU's terms.
  6. The result was not an authentic committee, but an illegitimate body born from a rigged process, directly violating the 2020 MOU.