PROOF 1.3
DNC MOU Violation

PROOF: Script's Detail Proves Deliberate Exclusion of Mandated Caucuses

Violation: The organizers deliberately violated the 2020 DNC MOU by forming the AAC while knowingly excluding 75% of the required racial diversity caucuses. The script's detail proves this was a calculated act of disenfranchisement—not an administrative failure—that breached the agreement's core terms.
Stakes: By proceeding without 75% of its required racial diversity caucuses, the committee's foundational decisions, including the election of its leadership, were rendered illegitimate.
Evidence Strength:
3 facts, 2 axioms

The Axioms (The Rules)

1

The 2020 DNC MOU required the creation of an Affirmative Action Committee ('AA Committee') to include members from each diversity group... selected by their particular caucus. Primary Source

2020 MOU between WVDP and DNC RBC, p. 2-3

2

The mandated diversity groups included African Americans, Native Americans, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and Latinos. Primary Source

2020 MOU between WVDP and DNC RBC, p. 2

Rule Summary

The MOU, as the governing agreement, established a mandatory sequence: 1) The party must facilitate the formation of specific diversity caucuses. 2) Those caucuses must select their own representatives. 3) Those representatives must then constitute the AA Committee. The committee's legitimacy was wholly dependent on the prior existence and participation of these groups.

The Offenses (What Happened)

The script for the June 2, 2021 meeting demonstrates micro-level control, dictating specific nominators, providing verbatim speeches, and planning for procedural disruptions.

Evidence: selina-script.pdf, p. 1-5 Official Record

The script proves the organizers knew 75% of the racial caucuses did not exist, as it includes a future resolution to 'do outreach to Latinos, Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders and Native Americans to facilitate those groups in forming their own diversity caucuses'.

Evidence: selina-script.pdf, p. 5 Official Record

The script designates a specific individual, Kim Felix, to be nominated for an at-large diversity seat 'representing Latino Americans', proving the organizers had identified potential leadership for a caucus they had not yet formed.

Evidence: selina-script.pdf, p. 3 Official Record

The Logical Reasoning

  1. The organizers demonstrated a high capacity for detailed organizational planning, as evidenced by the script.
  2. The organizers possessed documented knowledge that the Latino, AAPI, and Native American caucuses had not been formed as required by the MOU.
  3. When contrasted with their failure to form the required caucuses, the organizers' meticulous planning proves the exclusion was intentional.
  4. Therefore, the decision to proceed with the AAC's formation was a deliberate choice to exclude 75% of the required racial diversity caucuses from selecting leadership.
  5. The organizers deliberately violated the MOU by choosing exclusion over inclusion.

Was this page helpful?

Your feedback helps us keep every proof and method page useful.